It s true that some digital media really don t sound very good.
Does vinyl rip sound good.
A few exceptions exist.
Therefore 24 bit is way overkill 13 or 14 bits would do and 44 1khz sample rate would do the job just fine too.
Then again hard drive space is cheap so recording the noise floor of the record in fine detail doesn t really have a massive downside either.
I have many vinyl albums i m very fond of that have never had a cd release.
As a medium the 16 bit 44 1 ksps kilo samples per second cd is capable of more dynamic and frequency range than music itself but what comes off of course is only as good as the producer decides to put on it.
Before weighing vinyl s ahem good and bad sides it helps to know how records are made.
It caused songs to sound distorted and unpleasant and removed their depth and texture.
Las vegas for all the recent headlines you d think vinyl was the savior of good quality audio.
In several cases the music has never been released on cd so vinyl is the only way.
Clear vinyl picture discs and glow in the dark pressings are more susceptible to poor playback.
In brief an engineer such as gonsalves receives mixed recordings from the studio or even a band s laptop.
Vinyl is capable of around 80db on a very good day vs 96db for 16 bit cd.
Plenty of cds sound awful especially today but that s not the cd s fault.
Low bit rate mp3 makes compromises in fidelity as does low bit rate aac the higher tech successor to mp3 that is used by itunes.
In some cases the cd sounds good so i rip that as it s certainly simpler.
The problem here is that it had a tremendous result on the audio quality.
Vinyl for the most part avoided the loudness war with the rise of digital music cds included it s possible to make a track sound louder than it naturally should.
Very few additives can be mixed into clear vinyl without jeopardizing the opacity which means there is a potential for worse sound quality albeit this drop is often imperceptible to the common listener.